Getty - Rights Managed Reduced Prices

September 11th, 2007

Getty Images today announced that it is to introduce $39 images for use on the web. The Stock Artists Alliance have responded robustly to show their displeasure at this move. As I see it, this is another inevitable step in the commoditisation of stock photography since the advent of Microstock. I guess this will raise a flurry of response on various forms.

Getty Images Press Release

Getty Images Creates New Online Image Product

£39 Web-Resolution Image Product Opens All Collections to Online Advertisers, Marketers and Media

London – 11 September 2007 – Getty Images, Inc. today announced its new £39 web-resolution images which are available across virtually all of its editorial and creative collections. The new products enable customers producing content for the rapidly expanding online market to use award-winning imagery from the broadest and highest quality collection in the world in their online media and advertising.

The rapid growth of online and mobile media uses is driving an ever-expanding appetite for fresh content. This trend is expected to grow exponentially as new media absorbs an increasing share of both customer attention and marketing spend. According to the VSS Communications Industry Forecast 2007-2011 (VSS Forecast, http://www.vss.com/forecast07), “alternative advertising and marketing will continue to spur growth in the communications industry in 2007 and through 2011” at an expected growth of 17.4 percent during that time period, with traditional advertising and marketing seeing only a 3.2 percent growth rate.

“By providing the best collections of imagery in the world at the right quality level, appropriate resolution and compelling price point, Getty Images is raising the standard of using exceptional imagery in online communications,” said Jonathan Klein, CEO and co-founder of Getty Images. “Customers who once considered alternative sources of imagery for use in their online media and advertising campaigns, no longer need to sacrifice the quality of imagery. We anticipate that customers will enthusiastically embrace this product,” Klein added.

Getty Images’ new web-resolution product enables customers to access the entire breadth and depth of its collections – even the premium collections – for their online media and advertising campaigns. Additionally, Getty Images offers customers an unparalleled level of rights control and indemnification currently not found in the marketplace. Usage rights of the new web-resolution product, an image file size of 500 KB 72 dpi, will vary according to the license model. Royalty-free imagery may be licensed online today with rights-ready and rights-managed online licensing in the coming weeks.

About Getty Images

Getty Images is the world’s leading creator and distributor of visual content and the first place creative professionals turn to discover, purchase and manage imagery. The company’s award-winning photographers and imagery help customers create inspiring work which appears every day in the world’s most influential newspapers, magazines, advertising campaigns, films, television programs, books and Web sites. Headquartered in Seattle, WA and serving customers in more than 100 countries, Getty Images believes in the power of imagery to drive positive change, educate, inform, and entertain. Visit Getty Images at http://gettyimages.com

Stock Artists Alliance Press Release

Leading Photographer Groups Call on Getty Images to Remove Rights Managed Collections from new $49 “Web Use” License

Heavy discounting of premium stock imagery risks future revenue potential from major digital uses, as budgets shift from print to online.

Last week, Getty Images announced a new $49 “web use” license for images from all of its collections, including its highest quality Rights Managed collections. With this move, Getty has effectively slashed the value of commercial web use licenses by up to 96% off their established rates for Rights Managed photography.

In a coordinated response, leading trade associations representing over 12,000 professional photographers have called upon Getty Images to remove all Rights Managed imagery (including their Rights Ready brands) from this new license product.

The Stock Artists Alliance (SAA), the American Society of Media Photographers (ASMP), the U.K. Association of Photographers (AOP), Advertising Photographers of America (APA), Editorial Photographers (EP), and the Canadian Association of Photographers (CAPIC) represent top advertising and editorial assignment photographers and thousands of stock photographers- including many Getty contributors.

Their shared concern is that this extreme competitive response by Getty Images presents huge risks to the image licensing business, and threatens the livelihoods not only of Getty contributors but of professional photographers industry-wide.

In a joint letter sent to Getty Images CEO Jonathan Klein today, the associations have urged the company to reconsider this plan and remove the Rights Managed collections from the $49 license scheme. “Offering your very best imagery at heavily discounted prices,” they contend, “may well increase volume, but it also risks undermining Getty’s core licensing business-as well as the businesses of the independent contributing photographers who create and own the majority of imagery in your RM collections.”

Furthermore, the letter states, “As the market leader, Getty’s actions affect the entire industry. We therefore expect that your action of devaluing digital usage risks the long-term earning potential from image licensing, whether it be stock or commissioned.”

Anticipated consequences of this dramatic move, they suggest, include:

1. Loss of high-value digital license revenue.

Getty is unnecessarily giving up money from commercial and high-end advertising customers willing to pay premium prices for the most exclusive imagery. Now these same customers are rapidly shifting their large media budgets from print to the web as the internet emerges as their primary marketing platform. Spending for web advertising by these customers can easily rival traditional media budgets with many spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on relatively small media buys. This $49 deal gives away valuable rights for minimal prices that will not be replaced by increased volume for this kind of commercial usage.

2. Devaluation of RM licensing.

Flat-rate license fees run counter to the Rights Managed premise that price and value are commensurate with usage. The $49 deal lumps together buyers for global online ad campaigns with small mom-and-pop shops and local web uses. Flat-rate unit pricing is already being offered in Royalty Free products, and this new product will offer value-conscious customers access to quality RF imagery. There’s no need to extend it in RM. Offering the very best images at a bargain price point communicates to customers that all images, even the very best and most creative, are all worth the same.

3. Erosion of prices across the board.

The devaluation of web usage prices will lead to devaluing print and outdoor usage that will pave the way to further steep price cuts across all types of licenses. Once customers can obtain a major use license of an RM image at this cost, they will likely question the validity of being charged significantly higher rates for other uses.

4. Reduced return for photographers.

Lower per-image returns for photographers make it more difficult to produce the highly creative images that form the core of creative RM stock collections. These images cannot be produced in volume, and photographers are already feeling the impact of reduced revenues. This move further strains the viability of independent photographers’ businesses, and will result in less fresh imagery available for customers.

5. Reduced recovery value for images.

The offering by the world’s largest stock image supplier of all their images across the board at a $49 price point will have a serious impact on the valuation of claims in the courts for copyright infringement and lost/damaged originals. It also undermines the proposition that each image is unique and has to be valued on its own merits. Infringements of stock images are already at crisis levels-especially for web and digital uses. We are alarmed that a consequence of the low value established for web uses will dampen efforts to enforce copyrights and recover otherwise lost revenues.

Pricing on GettyImages.com for Web Uses

Collection License Use

placement / term Current Prices New Price (500KB) %Change

RM Commercial Website one page / 1 year $680 - $870 $49 93% - 95% reduction

RM Web Banner Ad

unlimited / 1 year $1140 - $1460 $49 96% reduction

RR Web & Electronic unlimited / 10 years $550 - $650 $49 91% - 92% reduction

RF Unlimited, Perpetual $55 - $145

(1MB) $49 11% - 66% reduction

Evolution is Needed

There is no doubt that stock licensing and pricing models must evolve to address the needs of a diversified marketplace of new media users, which include major stock image users, as well as new kinds of customers. An essential part of this evolution must include logical and consistent licensing and pricing structures that make sense to the customer, and that preserve the value of high quality professional imagery.

In closing, the association letter states: “We are eager to work with Getty Images and other leaders in the industry to find ways to evolve image licensing that address the changing needs of new media customers, and which leverage the distinctive value associated with Rights Managed imagery in a changing marketplace. We have a mutual interest in growing our image licensing businesses but respectfully contend that we must explore better ways to do so, which do not risk the value of what we have created.”

SAA president Roy Hsu, an Advertising Art Director specializing in digital media and stock photographer, explains: “Digital advertising is currently the fastest growing segment and will become the key source of high end advertising within the next few years. Internet based campaigns now can define brand campaigns and make headlines on their own, which used to be reserved by print and broadcast. Media budgets for online are now comparable and sometimes higher than those of traditional print media. This pricing scheme oversimplifies a complex industry by mixing the high and low end users together, and the discounting these digital uses is in effect giving up on the high-end customer.”

Coordinated Action by Photographer Associations

This is the latest example of coordinated advocacy initiatives by leading photographer trade associations who are increasingly working together to address issues of common concern to their members. They have also joined together as members of the PLUS, The Picture Licensing Universal System; and the Imagery Alliance, a diverse coalition of industry stakeholders formed to respond to proposed “orphan works” legislation, and to champion the need for industry licensing and metadata standards, and copyright education.

Reboot

August 11th, 2007

This blog has been languishing for a great deal of time, I have decided to give it a reboot.

A lot has happened in the past 18 months (inevitably). I have been very busy and engaged in my day job which has really prevented me devoting too much time to the internet.

I also became somewhat jaded with photography, but several things occurred to change that.

Right now I have a great appetite for photography and I thought I would go for a ‘reboot’.

Image Size

October 14th, 2005

Looking around various blogs the other day led me to start thinking about image size for posting in blogs. All my images are presented with a maximum length of 600px. I have chosen this as a compromise between viewability, file size and abilirty to fit on the screen. It is noticeable that a lot of people are moving to 700px maximum length now and some of these images certainly do have more impact. The problem I have is that when they are either square or portrait, they are difficult to get complete onto the screen of my laptop - I have to flip into fullscreen mode. The tabs on Firefox are a problem in this area. On my home pc there is no problem, butI am often away and use my laptop for viewing blogs.

There are a variety of smaller images - when I used blogger as a home, my images were posted at 500px which was the default produced when posting out of Flickr. The standard was, I think, 400px which in my view is far too small to see well.

Do you have a view on this - do let me know.

The Reciprocal Nature of Commenting

October 7th, 2005

A comment on yesterday’s image by Joe Ob raises an issue, I wonder what others think about it.

OK, this needs to be said, and please don’t take it as being bitter, but you’re getting 35 comments because you are making comments on evry other blog. It is like a game of tig. I had a go the other day and close up every person’s blog I made a coment on, they made one back. All sorts of ‘great shot’ stuff. Us bloggers, me included, need to focus on quality, otherwise what is the point? I understand that we all want a little recognition but come on, more time on decent shots, less on congratulating each other. Am I wrong here?

My response is as follows:

Joe - thank you for commenting twice on my blog today. You are of course correct that blog commenting is in some way reciprocal and that the number of comments reflects in some high measure the degree of one’s activity in commenting elsewhere. Indeed, this is so self apparent that I am not sure what point you are seeking to make by mentioning it. Nor do I understand how this relates to the quality of my images.

It is true that my four images this week have more than 30 comments, though last week I had around what I normally get each day which is somewhere in the 20s without any change in routine.

Clearly you are unaware of my personal circumstances and why I do a lot of commenting and I feel no need to explain that. You are welcome to continue commenting on my blog or otherwise.

It is self evident that there is some correlation between level of commenting and level of comments received. I have discussed many times with some of you the whole nature of commenting, what value they have and how useful they could be. Some of the discussion has been in comments and some in the articles listed below:

What is your take on the issue of reciprocal commenting

  • Do you feel compelled to reciprocate?
  • Is there a problem caused by people who do a lot of commenting?
  • How does commenting impact quality?

As ever, I seek your honest views.

Favourite Subjects

October 4th, 2005

Looking around all of our photoblogs throws up a massive range of subject material and a variety of treatments thereof. Yesterday we discussed taboo subjects, or subjects we have difficulty with. This made me think about what I look for as a subject in a picture I shoot.

  • Colour
  • Odd/unique angle
  • Theme
  • Challenge

Above all I look for colour in my subjects and then I try to make a close crop or an unusual view. Most of my subjects are inanimate though I occasionally take animals. Looking through my thumbnails, I see no real pattern overall in my subject matter. I guess my work is characterised in the findingof a new take on a common theme.

What subjects do you most like to take?


casino falls hotel niagara 7 sultan online casino casino eagle michigan mt pleasant soaring oklahoma casino casino royale trailer winstar casino thackerville oklahoma blue chip casino michigan city indiana bossier city casino casino in washington state oklahoma casino. morongo hotel and casino. blue chip casino michigan city indiana. playtech no deposit bonus casino. avi resort and casino. casino fun game play. casino eagle michigan mt pleasant soaring. silver star casino philadelphia ms. casino falls hotel niagara. casino download free full game version. seminole hard rock casino. carnival casino. jackpot nevada casino. south coast casino las vegas. casino harrahs rincon. wynn hotel and casino. taj mahal casino. casino in washington state. bossier city casino. no deposit casinos. san manuel casino san bernardino. harrahs casino cherokee nc. river rock casino vancouver. palm casino resort. ballys casino in atlantic city. bonus casino coupon no purchase redeem. 7 sultan online casino. hard rock casino tampa fl. winstar casino thackerville oklahoma. pechanga casino temecula ca. morongo casino resort. fallsview casino niagara falls. potawatomi casino. sands hotel and casino. casino royale trailer. carnival casino harrahs casino cherokee nc casino harrahs rincon seminole hard rock casino jackpot nevada casino casino fun game play playtech no deposit bonus casino potawatomi casino morongo hotel and casino